Welcome!

This Commons sight responds to a frustration (mine) and an opportunity (proposed by a colleague):

I write a short piece nearly every week for Hostos Community College’s El Semanario, a comprehensive newsletter established by President Cocco De Fillipis to serve as a weekly document of the college’s actions and events. These pieces return to familiar themes and introduce new ones. Compiling them in one spot is an invitation to review what have been IE priorities at Hostos over the past years.

Less self-servingly, a colleague recently asked me where he could find these posts without having to search through back issues of El Semanario – and because there was no other way, he suggested a blog. The content, even when it is a few years old, can be helpful reference for grants, reports and research at Hostos and beyond. While tech-hesitant and prone to procrastination, this was the push I needed.

Zooming in on Withdrawals Intersectionally

11/21/2025 – Among the more “meta” performance indicators tracked by the Office of Academic Affairs (OAA) and OIERA are the rate of W, or withdrawal, grades. 

While W grades are typically bundled as part of the “DWFI” cluster (D and F grades, W grades and Incompletes), each suggests a range of reasons why students earned, or ended up, with a DWFI. This is an opportunity to look more closely at W grades in relation to credits attempted, credits completed, and to explore whether there are significant differences across variables of gender, race/ethnicity and age. The goal of these smaller scale excavations is to get a sense of correlations of outcomes across time, and to hold ourselves accountable for student outcomes in general as well as indications that we may be able to target supports to ensure improved student outcomes overall. 

There are several categories of “W” grades, some that indicate students are being proactive, and others that suggest students have stopped attending, or participating in, class. 

The table below suggests there is a fairly consistent relation between the number of courses attempted and the number of courses completed. Additionally, it suggests that many First Time Freshmen (FTF) attempt the recommended five courses in their first semesters. What we cannot learn from these aggregate data is if those students attempting five courses are more or less likely to withdraw from one of their respective courses. Data shared in October indicates that nearly 50% of FTF who attempt 30 or more credits in their first two semesters drop at least one of those classes, compared to the approximately 35-40% of FTF who attempt 20 or more credits in their first two semesters. 

Fall 2022Fall 2023Fall 2024
CoursesattemptedW GradesCoursescompletedCoursesattemptedW GradesCoursescompletedCoursesattemptedW GradesCourses completed
First Time Freshmen5.121%4.04.725.7%3.54.919.1%3.9
All students4.217.4%3.43.819.9%3.03.915.2%3.3

Looking more closely at the data, there were small and consistent gender-based differences: over the three years of data, male students had a 2 percentage point (or 7-8%) higher W rate than female students. More notable was the difference between students who are 25 or younger compared to students who are older than 25 (about 40% of Hostos students): 

Fall 2022Fall 2023Fall 2021
CoursesattemptedW GradesCoursescompletedCoursesattemptedW GradesCoursescompletedCoursesattemptedW GradesCoursescompleted
25 and underFirst Time Freshmen5.222.8%4.04.827%3.55.019.8%4.0
25 and underAll students4.419.3%3.43.822.5%2.93.916.5%3.3
Over 25First Time Freshmen4.612.3%4.14.117.1%3.44.414.9%3.7
Over 25All students4.012.5%3.53.713.2%3.23.912.4%3.4

Here the difference between the rate of Ws earned by students 25 and under and students over 25 ranges between more than 45% and 25%. What might this mean? That First Year Experience (FYE) is that much more important for students 25 and under transitioning (nearly) directly from high school? That older students are more adept at evaluating their chances of succeeding in the long run and/or accessing support services? We don’t know and the significance of the gap between cohort outcomes is an opportunity to look further at course-enrollment patterns and the correlations between – for example – accessing HALC, or meeting regularly with advisors – that might help guide outreach and effort to ensure that if students earn W grades, these are a strategic decision and not a default outcome.